| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerMost Recent Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer Archive |
Residential and commercial real estate markets are bedeviled by recurring woes despite rather
reasonable expectations for the markets to restore to relative normalcy by now. In fact, the
predominant practice of borrowing ONLY to a very elite and selected group of borrowers has inhibited
even a semblance of real estate recovery. The outlook is grim and gloomy, as lenders continue to
tighten already restrictive lending standards. Let us explore the rationale behind such declining
and worsening real estate environment in more detail.
SOME BACKGROUND
In light of the financial crisis, lenders resorted to extreme measures to stanch real estate bleeding. Such measures included requiring borrowers to:
1. INCREASING FORECLOSURES HITTING THE REAL ESTATE MARKET HARDER THAN EVER
Usually, after a period of financial doldrums, businesses seek to turn the page and become profitable by securing new businesses. Nonetheless, for real estate market, this trend is not necessarily the case as one crisis follows another one. In fact, the glut of foreclosures hitting the real estate market has exacerbated the already shaky real estate market and made lenders more reluctant and fearful of borrowing.
2. INCREASING RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY LENDERS
This is ironic that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as the government bulwark against private industry's strangulation of real estate market has become the impetus for further regulation and strangulation of such industry. In fact, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as quasi governmental entities (i.e. both private and public) weathered intensified pressure from Congress to ensure federal dollars are not spent on projects or drives similar to what led to the sub-prime mortgage crisis as a frightening prelude to a full-blown financial crisis.
MUCH HIGHER STANDARDS REQUIRED
Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac can now require banks to buy back loans they issued if Fannie and Freddi can prove the loan did not meet underwriting guidelines. This is an extremely exorbitant and somehow unacceptable proposition and specter for banks. With this in mind, banks have put into place the following rigid requirements, some even higher than what the Federal Housing Administration requires:
NOTE
This is extremely important to ensure borrowers are able to pay off their loans to proactively eschew the devastating problems which led to sub-prime crisis and other financial catastrophes. Nonetheless, extreme regulation and unnecessary diligence in unwarranted cases could further stagnate and even spur a double-dip real estate recession. In fact, it seems the pendulum has swung to the other direction rather imprudently and perilously.
________________
DORON EGHBALI is a Partner at the Beverly Hills Offices of Law Advocate Group, LLP. He Primarily Practices Business, Real Estate and Entertainment Law. Doron Can Be Reached at: 310-651-3065. For More Information, Please, Visit: HERE.
